Legal Opinion

Cicero v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 24, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, President Judge.

Joseph Cicero petitions this Court for review of a Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) order that affirmed the decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) granting Cicero’s claim petition, but suspending his benefits as of the date of injury pursuant to the relevant provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §§ 1-1041.4; 2501-2626.

The WCJ found in pertinent part as follows. Cicero worked as a bag machine operator for M & Q Packaging (Employer) at an average weekly wage of $243.50 when he sustained an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. House v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Morey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Harle v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Banic v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. McKay v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Klarich v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API