Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 16, 1931No. 7620PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. “A liead of a family may alienate his reversionary interest in a homestead set apart to him and his family under the constitution of 1868. Walker v. Hodges, 113 Ga. 1042 (39 S. E. 480); Carrie v. Carnes, 145 Ga. 184 (88 S. E. 949); Yeates v. Donalson, 147 Ga. 335 (94 S. E. 465); Aiken v. Weldon, 139 Ga. 15 (76 S. E. 359)” Browning v. Barber, 154 Ga. 221 (113 S. E. 797).

2. “Where a husband pays the purchase-money of land from his own funds and has the land conveyed to his wife, the presumption which the law raises is that the husband intended to make a gift to his wife; but the presumption…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  2. Walker v. HodgesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Browning v. BarberSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  4. Carrie v. CarnesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  5. Aiken v. WeldonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wardlaw v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  2. Bullard v. BullardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  3. Donalson v. YeatesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  4. Dorsey v. DorseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  5. Statham v. CouncilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API