Browning v. Barber
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtFish, C. J.
1. A head of a .family may alienate his “ reversionary interest ” in a homestead set apart to him and his family under the constitution of 1868. Walker v. Hodges, 113 Ga. 1042 (39 S. E. 480); Carrie v. Carnes, 145 Ga. 184 (88 S. E. 949); Yeates v. Donalson, 147 Ga. 335 (94 S. E. 465); Aiken v. Weldon, 139 Ga. 15 (76 S. E. 359).
2. Where a husband pays the purchase-money of land from his own funds and has the land conveyed to his wife, the presumption which the law raises is that the husband intended to make a gift to his wife; but the presumption is a rebuttable one, and a resulting trust in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
- Walker v. HodgesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Carrie v. CarnesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Aiken v. WeldonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Yeates v. DonalsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Williams v. ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Wardlaw v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
- Freeman v. SaxtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Freeman v. SaxtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Langan v. LanganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.