Legal Opinion

Browning v. Barber

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 20, 1922No. 2848PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFish, C. J.

1. A head of a .family may alienate his “ reversionary interest ” in a homestead set apart to him and his family under the constitution of 1868. Walker v. Hodges, 113 Ga. 1042 (39 S. E. 480); Carrie v. Carnes, 145 Ga. 184 (88 S. E. 949); Yeates v. Donalson, 147 Ga. 335 (94 S. E. 465); Aiken v. Weldon, 139 Ga. 15 (76 S. E. 359).

2. Where a husband pays the purchase-money of land from his own funds and has the land conveyed to his wife, the presumption which the law raises is that the husband intended to make a gift to his wife; but the presumption is a rebuttable one, and a resulting trust in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  2. Walker v. HodgesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Carrie v. CarnesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  4. Aiken v. WeldonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  5. Yeates v. DonalsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Williams v. ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  2. Wardlaw v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  3. Freeman v. SaxtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  4. Freeman v. SaxtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  5. Langan v. LanganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API