United States v. Food and Grocery Bureau of Southern California, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, District Judge.
The opinion on the demurrer (United States v. Food and Grocery Bureau et al., D.C.Cal., 1941, 41 F.Supp. 884) abstracts the allegations of the indictment. The opinion on the motions to dismiss and to strike (United States v. Food and Grocery Bureau et al., D.C.Cal., 43 F.Supp. 966, filed March 11, 1942) outlines the Government’s proof.
So, in stating the grounds for the verdict to be announced, we may start, both factually and legally, where we left off in those two opinions.
In a famous English prosecution for a criminal libel against Parliament, in which, although…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State Ex Rel. Clark v. AdamsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
- United States v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1948
- United States v. San Francisco Electrical Contractors Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1944
- United States v. JonesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.