Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Haas v. Club Recreation & Pleasure

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 20, 1979No. A 7802-02280, CA 11302PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

Defendants appeal from an order and decree of the trial court finding that they had maintained a nuisance by establishing, maintaining, using and occupying certain premises for lewdness, assignation and prostitution. Suit was brought by the state pursuant to ORS 465.110 through 465.180 which provide for the abatement of certain nuisances. Defendants raise many challenges to the statutory abatement scheme, several of which merit our discussion here, and challenge the sufficiency of the evidence as to one of the trial court’s findings of fact. We affirm.

Defendant Club Recreation and Pleasure…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brown v. Multnomah County District CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Lavine v. MilneSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Pompano Horse Club, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. BryanSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  4. Lane County v. R. A. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Palm Gardens, Inc. v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Spenard Action Committee v. Lot 3, Block 1, Evergreen SubdivisionAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State Ex Rel. Haas v. DionneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. State Ex Rel. Haas v. DionneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. State Ex Rel. Haas v. DionneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API