Legal Opinion

People v. One 1988 Mazda 323, VIN JM1BF232XJ0131664

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 1993No. 92CA1491PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge TURSI.

The People appeal from the judgment entered by the trial court in favor of defendant Naómi Phillips, holding that her Mazda automobile is not subject to forfeiture under Colorado’s Abatement of Public Nuisance Act, § 16-13-301, et seq., C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8A). We affirm.

The following facts were stipulated to by the parties. Defendant owned the 1988 Mazda that is the subject of this action. She used it lawfully to drive to and from her job in a department store. On two separate occasions, defendant was observed removing merchandise from the store without paying for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. MiltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Lyman v. Town of Bow MarSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  3. S. A. S. v. District Court, in & for the County of JeffersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  4. Walker v. City of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. People v. One 1979 VolkswagenColorado Court of Appeals · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. GrellColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. People v. SalehColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Wolford v. Pinnacol AssuranceColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. People v. SalehColorado Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API