Legal Opinion
People v. Grell
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided August 21, 1997No. 96CA0384PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge HUME.
In this civil forfeiture action, under the Abatement of Public Nuisance Act, § 16-13-301, et seq., C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8A) (Act), defendant, Ki Suk Grell, appeals the judgment of the trial court dismissing her as a party to the suit for lack of standing. We affirm.
A health club at which defendant was employed was investigated as a cover for a prostitution business. After the business was closed by the sheriff’s office, the People filed a forfeiture action against the contents of the building, naming several individuals, including defendant, as parties to the action.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Page v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- Board of County Commissioners v. Bowen/Edwards Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- In the Interest of ClintonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- State Board for Community Colleges & Occupational Education v. OlsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Games-Neely Ex Rel. West Virginia State Police v. 1175 Sam Mason Road Loacated in Mill Creek DistrictWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
- SMLL, L.L.C. v. Peak National BankColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
- Lot Thirty-Four Venture, L.L.C. v. Town of TellurideColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- Hanson v. Colorado Department of RevenueColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- Hoyman v. CoffinColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.