Ex Parte Queen
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANTS PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
MALONEY, Judge.
This is a pre-trial application for writ of habeas corpus seeking to bar a retrial on double jeopardy grounds after the trial court has granted appellant’s motion for new trial on a ground other than insufficient evidence. The trial court denied the pre-trial writ of habeas corpus. The First Court of Appeals affirmed with the Chief Justice concurring. Ex parte Queen, 833 S.W.2d 207 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether a defendant waives the right…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Marsden W. Miller, Jr., and William C. Huls, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- In re L.M.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- In Re Office of the Attorney General of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Vrba v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2002
- Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
- Kombudo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.