McCoy v. Lane
Nebraska Supreme Court
ERROR from the district court for Douglas county. Action in the nature of indebitatus assumpsit for services as attorneys at law. Tried below before Baxter, J. Verdict for defendants. Judgment on verdict.
1Opinion of the Court
Albert, 0.
On the 27th day of September, 1893, the defendant Mary W. Hay was appointed guardian of her codefendants by the county court of Douglas county, where the wards resided. It appears that the only property of the wards at that time was certain real estate in the city of Omaha, which was subject to five apparent liens, aggregating some $3,500, exclusive of interest. Afterward, an action was brought by the holder of one of such liens for its foreclosure, in which the defendant Mary W. Hay, as guardian of the other defendants herein, her wards, and the other lien-holders, were made…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Taylor v. BemissSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Forster v. FullerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
- Crim v. EnglandWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
- Kelly v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Miller v. HartIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cotner v. Lon Jacobs Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Evans v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Hazlett v. Estate of MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
- In Re Agee's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1927
- Matthews v. MiresSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.