Legal Opinion

Royal M. Ladnier v. Gary L. Norwood, D.V.M.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 30, 1986No. 85-3193PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff Royal M. Ladnier brought suit against defendants Dr. Gary L. Norwood, D.V.M., his insurer, Associated Indemnity Corporation, and Back-Stretch Surgery and Medicine, Inc. to recover damages for the death of Ladnier’s thoroughbred racehorse, Flush Pilot. Ladnier alleged that Dr. Nor-wood was negligent in administering a drug known as Myosel-E to Flush Pilot. The trial was to the court without a jury; the court found for the defendants. After carefully reviewing the record, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

Royal M. Ladnier, a resident of Mississippi, purchased Flush Pilot…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Ardoin v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  3. Meyer v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  4. LaCaze v. CollierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  5. Karl J. Pizzalotto, MD, Ltd. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Downing v. GullyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Carter v. Louisiana State UniversitySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
  3. Williamson v. PridaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Helen Lidy v. Film Transit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  5. Moreland v. LowdermilkDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API