Legal Opinion

LaCaze v. Collier

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 8, 1983No. 82-C-1714PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

434 So.2d 1039 (1983)

Phillip LaCAZE et ux.

v.

L.R. COLLIER, M.D.

No. 82-C-1714.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 17, 1983.

Concurring Opinion July 8, 1983.

Charles J. Yeager, Kennedy & Yeager, Alexandria, for applicant.

Frederick B. Alexius, R. Rae Swent, Provosty, Sadler & Delaunay, Alexandria, for respondent.

DIXON, Chief Justice.

Doretha R. LaCaze and her husband, Phillip R. LaCaze, sued her doctor, L.R. Collier, M.D., for damages resulting from complications arising after surgery. The case was tried before a judge who dismissed the plaintiffs' claims. The Court of Appeal, 416 So.2d 619, affirmed.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  3. Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Natanson v. KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  5. Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Hondroulis v. SchuhmacherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Gunter v. PlaucheSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  3. Estrada v. JaquesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Lugenbuhl v. DowlingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  5. Christian Lewis v. Sheila D. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API