Vice v. Thurston

MANFORD, Judge.

This is a civil action for wages claimed due pursuant to both an employment contract and under § 290.110, RSMo 1986. The judgment is affirmed.

Appellant presents three points which, in summary, charge the trial court erred (1) in entering judgment because the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction; (2) in concluding he (appellant) was liable as an undisclosed principal; and (3) in finding wages due pursuant to and under § 290.110, RSMo 1986.

It is noted, at the outset, that this was a case tried to the court without a jury. In addition, this court was not provided a transcript…