Legal Opinion

Mayfield v. Brown Shoe Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 1997No. 21215PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHRUM, Judge.

This is a workers’ compensation case. The question presented is which of two consecutive employers is hable for the work-related occupational disease of Debra Mayfield (Claimant).

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) ruled that Claimant’s first employer, Brown Shoe Co. (Brown), was liable under the three-month provision of § 287.067.7. 1 On appeal, Brown contends that Claimant’s second employer, Arlee Home Fashions (Arlee), 2 is liable as a matter of law under the “last exposure” rule of § 287.063. This Court disagrees with Brown’s contentions. We affirm the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. West v. Posten Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. Wright v. Sports Associated, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  3. State Ex Rel. Rhodes v. CrouchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  4. Vaught v. Vaughts, Inc./Southern Missouri ConstructionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. State Ex Rel. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District v. SandersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ronald Malam v. State of Missouri, Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  2. Sanderson v. Porta-Fab Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Feltrop v. Eskens Drywall and InsulationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Smith v. Tiger Coaches, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Bull v. Excel Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API