Mayfield v. Brown Shoe Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SHRUM, Judge.
This is a workers’ compensation case. The question presented is which of two consecutive employers is hable for the work-related occupational disease of Debra Mayfield (Claimant).
The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) ruled that Claimant’s first employer, Brown Shoe Co. (Brown), was liable under the three-month provision of § 287.067.7. 1 On appeal, Brown contends that Claimant’s second employer, Arlee Home Fashions (Arlee), 2 is liable as a matter of law under the “last exposure” rule of § 287.063. This Court disagrees with Brown’s contentions. We affirm the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- West v. Posten Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Wright v. Sports Associated, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- State Ex Rel. Rhodes v. CrouchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
- Vaught v. Vaughts, Inc./Southern Missouri ConstructionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- State Ex Rel. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District v. SandersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ronald Malam v. State of Missouri, Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
- Sanderson v. Porta-Fab Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Feltrop v. Eskens Drywall and InsulationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Smith v. Tiger Coaches, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Bull v. Excel Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.