Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Sterling

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1879PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Marquette. Bill to enforce vendor’s lien. The bill was dismissed below and complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

Complainant filed his bill in this cause to enforce a vendor’s lien on property alleged to *220have been sold by him October 7, 1874, to his daughter, the defendant Virginia Sterling, for which it is claimed she gave her note for $4,980, payable 18 months after date, as the purchase price. Defendant Caroline Williams is charged to have become a purchaser with notice.

The record contains much testimony bearing on the family relations of the parties, which we do not think it important to discuss, as the testimony of complainant himself is conclusive against his right to this remedy.

He states in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. ClevelandMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Mowrey v. VandlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Sears Administrator v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1851
  4. Widner v. OlmsteadMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Weare v. LinnellMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. GoldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Dunton v. OuthouseMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Shafter v. HuntingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Judd v. JuddMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Lovett v. TaylorNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API