Dunton v. Outhouse
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Kent. (Montgomery, J.) Bill to declare and enforce a vendor’s lien. Defendant Sarah Outhouse appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
The bill of complaint in this cause was filed by Chauncey Curtiss, since deceased, in which he stated that on and prior to January 19, 1884, he was seized and possessed in his own right, in fee simple, of lands situated in the county of Kent and State of Michigan, described as follows: Lots 1 and 2 of block 1 of Canton Smith's addition to the city of Grand Kapids, also the south-east quarter of the north-west quarter, and the west half of the north-east quarter, of section 11, township 8 north, rangell west, excepting 20 acres off from the north end of said west half of the north-east quarter.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gilman v. BrownU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1817
- Garson v. GreenNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
- Manly v. SlasonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
- Mowrey v. VandlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
- Palmer v. SterlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Curtis v. MuellerMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Biddle v. BiddleMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Lavin v. LynchMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Peoples Savings Bank v. GeistertMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Zeigler v. Valley Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.