Bishop v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge:
The parties in this case came to court prepared to argue the mysteries of permissive intervention and intervention of right as set out in Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. During oral argument, however, it developed that the parties were not in a state of certitude as to whether the district court had jurisdiction of the ease in which appellants were attempting to intervene. After reading the supplemental briefs submitted by the parties at our request and considering the matter further, we are convinced that the district court had no jurisdiction over…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Boire v. Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Brooks v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- V.G.I. Harvesting Co. v. Arizona Agricultural Employment Relations BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Bishop v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974