Hartford Ins. Grp. Ex Rel. Chen v. Kamara
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
CHIEF JUSTICE SAYLOR, Dissenting
For the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Domtar Paper Co., 631 Pa. 463, 113 A.3d 1230 (2015), I would reaffirm this Court's understanding of the concept of subrogation, as articulated in previous decisions. See, e.g., Frazier v. WCAB (Bayada Nurses, Inc.), 616 Pa. 592, 603, 52 A.3d 241, 248 (2012) ("In subrogation, the insurer stands in the shoes of the insured in attempting to recover what is rightfully owed to it from a third-party tortfeasor.") (internal quotations omitted); Scalise v. F.M. Venzie & Co., 301 Pa.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. McMullenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Frazier v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Scalise v. F. M. Venzie Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.