Legal Opinion

Grochocinski v. Spehar Capital, LLC (In Re CMGT, Inc.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 18, 2011No. 17-32019PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN H. SQUIRES, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the motion of Spehar Capital, LLC (“Spe-har”) for sanctions and fees against David E. Grochocinski, the Chapter 7 trustee (the “Trustee”) of the bankruptcy estate of CMGT, Inc. (“CMGT”), and his attorneys, Grochocinski, Grochocinski & Lloyd (the “Firm”). For the reasons set forth herein, the Court denies Spehar’s motion to sanction the Trustee and the Firm.

I. JURISDICTION AND PROCEDURE

The Court has jurisdiction to entertain this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334 and Internal Operating Procedure 15(a)…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Stephen Michael Ridder v. City of Springfield, Clark CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  3. Robert N. Corley and Vera M. Corley v. Rosewood Care Center, Inc. Of PeoriaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  4. Matrix IV, Inc. v. American Nat. Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  5. James W. Adair v. Michael L. Sherman and Sherman & ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re MehlhoseUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
  2. In re GorgesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
  3. In re LeeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
  4. In re EzellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API