Legal Opinion
Guanyu Li v. Stockx.com
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided October 17, 2018No. CIVIL NO. JKB-18-0911PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJames K. Bredar, Chief Judge
Guanyu Li ("Plaintiff") filed this putative class action against StockX.com ("Defendant," or "StockX"1 ), alleging violations of *520Maryland's Consumer Protection Act, fraud, and negligence in the operation of StockX's online marketplace. (Compl., ECF No. 2.) Defendant moved to compel arbitration and stay proceedings, or, in the alternative, to dismiss the action, under the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 3 and 4 ["FAA"]. (Mot. Compel Arbitration at 1, ECF No. 7.) No hearing is required. See Local Rule 105.6 (D. Md. 2016). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant's Motion will be granted…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dixon v. LGX Services LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
- Hall v. State Employees Credit Union of MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- Porsche Kemp v. Aroma 360, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2026