Legal Opinion

Porsche Kemp v. Aroma 360, LLC

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided February 24, 2026No. 1:25-cv-01630Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND PORSCHE KEMP, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. 25-cv-1630-ABA AROMA 360, LLC, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Porsche Kemp purchased a large, scented candle (55 oz, four wicks) on the website aroma360.com. She alleges that it was defective: instead of the wicks burning like a regular candle, the entire candle itself combusted, and burned her hands and arms when she tried to extinguish the flames. She has sued Defendant Aroma 360, LLC (“Aroma 360”) alleging claims of product liability, negligence, and gross negligence. In…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Nicosia v. Amazon.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  3. Meyer v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  4. Lamps Plus, Inc. v. VarelaSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  5. Schnabel v. Trilegiant Corp. & Affinion, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API