Legal Opinion

Ackel v. Ackel

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1957No. 6200PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Chief Justice.

The sole appellant here is Edward Ackel, Sr. While he presents some twenty-two poorly-drawn assignments of error and fifteen supporting propositions of law, we are of the opinion the appeal can be effectively disposed of by considering only these two related questions, viz.:

1. Did the trial court err in its finding of fact and its judgment based thereon, that appellant was not a party to the suit nor a person interested in the outcome of these proceedings?

2. If the above question be answered in the negative, does the appellant have any standing to prosecute this appeal…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City and County of Denver v. Denver Tramway CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  2. Ross v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Cheatham v. WhitmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  4. Johnson v. WaterhouseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  5. In re the Estate of PinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Garrick v. WeaverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  2. Kemble v. PorterArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Garrick v. WeaverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  4. Bowen v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. People v. LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API