Legal Opinion

Eberle v. Sambab

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1929No. Docket No. 54, Calendar No. 34,492PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

This bill was filed to redeem from the foreclosure of a mortgage by advertisement, for an accounting as to the amount due on the mortgage, and to recover damages for the ejectment of plaintiffs Tomaska from the premises.

The evidence shows that on August 25,1925, Julius Falkenberg and wife executed a mortgage to the defendants on the premises in question for $1,950. On January 11,1927, the Falkenbergs sold the premises to plaintiff Stephen Eberle. Matthew Tomaska and wife bought them on land contract from Eberle, went into possession, and remained there until ejected after the foreclosure…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Caruthers v. HumphreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Potts v. PlaistedMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Waldron v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Hayward v. ChaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Strempek v. First Nat. Bank &8212 Detroit.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Federal Discount Corp. v. RushMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API