Legal Opinion

Skow v. Shulps

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.

(Pro Tempore)

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff while a passenger in defendant’s automobile. Plaintiff claims as a paid passenger and alleges only simple negligence.

Ruth E. Skow, the plaintiff, and Darlene Shulps, the defendant, were girl friends of several years’ standing. They decided to take an automobile trip together from Portland to San Francisco and return and in furtherance ‘of this plan arranged for their vacations to come at the same time.

The trip was to be strictly a pleasure trip, with no business purpose involved. They had…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Huebotter v. FollettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Miller v. FairleyOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Smith v. CluteNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Dirksmeyer v. BarnesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
  5. Johnson v. KolovosOregon Supreme Court · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sinclair v. BarkerOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Fullerton v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API