Legal Opinion
Avocent Huntsville Corp. v. Clearcube Technology, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided July 12, 2006No. CIVA CV03S2875NEPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SMITH, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Avocent Huntsville Corporation (“Avocent”), owns two patents directed to the problems of transmitting computer-generated, analog color video signals over extended distances: ie., U.S. Patent No. 6,150,997 (“the ’997 patent”), and U.S. Patent No. 6,184,919 (“the ’919 patent”). Avocent contends that accused products of defendant, ClearCube Technology, Inc. (“ClearCube”), infringe claim 1 of the ’997 patent, and claims 1, 6, and 16-18 of the ’919 patent. 1 See 35 U.S.C. § 271. ClearCube’s amended answer asserts affirmative defenses and…
2Cases cited110 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bone Care International, LLC v. Pentech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- In Re Johnson Systems, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2010
- Goss International Americas, Inc. v. K & M Newspaper Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006