Gojmerac v. Mahn
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtCane, C.J.
¶ 1. Gary and Pamela Gojmerac appeal from a portion of a judgment declaring that owners of numerous subdivision lots have a valid easement for ingress and egress over the western portion of the Gojmeracs' property. We conclude that only those lots that were part of the dominant estate at the time the easement was created are entitled to use the easement. The two lots that were not part of the dominant estate do not have a valid easement. Therefore, we affirm in part and reverse in part the portion of the judgment declaring the rights of the owners of particular lots. Because neither party…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hunter v. McDonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Atkinson v. MentzelCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
- Edlin v. SoderstromWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Millen v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
- Union Falls Power Co. v. Marinette CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- AKG REAL ESTATE, LLC v. KostermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Solowicz v. Forward Geneva National, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- Grygiel v. Monches Fish & Game Club, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- Borek Cranberry Marsh, Inc. v. Jackson CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- Christensen v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.