Legal Opinion

Niemann v. Zarsky

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 10, 1950No. 4718PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUTTON, Justice.

This is an appeal from, the District Court of Refugio County.

The case was tried on the second amended original petition wherein Harry Niemann appeared as plaintiff in the capacity of Guardian of the Estate of August Niemann, a person of unsound mind, and Elsie Niemann, the wife of August Nie-mann, individually. John L. Zarsky, the Commercial State Bank, Roy Jackson, W. C. Sparks and Addie Smith, as Executrix of the estate of C. C. Smith, deceased, were named defendants.

The purpose of the suit was to cancel a deed of trust executed December 1, 1924, by August Niemann and wife,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Joske v. IrvineTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Wininger v. Ft. Worth & Denver City Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Harpold v. MossTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Holt v. GordonTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Self v. BeckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pollard v. El Paso National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  2. Lawrence v. Farm and Home Savings AssocCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API