Legal Opinion · Dissent

Smith v. Jones

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 21, 2016No. Appellate Case No. 2013-002810; Opinion No. 5462Published

1DissentLockemy, C.J.

I respectfully dissent and would reverse the order granting summary judgment and remand this case for trial on both issues.

“A motion for a continuance is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial [court], whose judgment will be reversed only on showing an abuse of discretion.” Crout v. S.C. Nat. Bank, 278 S.C. 120, 123, 293 S.E.2d 422, 423 (1982).

“Since it is a drastic remedy, summary judgment ‘should be cautiously invoked so that no person will be improperly deprived of a trial of the disputed factual issues.’ ” Baughman v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 306 S.C. 101, 112, 410 S.E.2d 537, 543…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baughman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Watson v. Southern Railway Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1975
  4. Schmidt v. CourtneyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  5. Robertson v. First Union National BankCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API