Smith v. Jones
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1DissentLockemy, C.J.
I respectfully dissent and would reverse the order granting summary judgment and remand this case for trial on both issues.
“A motion for a continuance is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial [court], whose judgment will be reversed only on showing an abuse of discretion.” Crout v. S.C. Nat. Bank, 278 S.C. 120, 123, 293 S.E.2d 422, 423 (1982).
“Since it is a drastic remedy, summary judgment ‘should be cautiously invoked so that no person will be improperly deprived of a trial of the disputed factual issues.’ ” Baughman v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 306 S.C. 101, 112, 410 S.E.2d 537, 543…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Baughman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Watson v. Southern Railway Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1975
- Schmidt v. CourtneyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- Robertson v. First Union National BankCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.