Legal Opinion
Hargrove v. Tanner
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 6, 1990No. 14328PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cacioppo, Judge.
Melissa Hargrove filed a complaint for her daughter, Natasha. The complaint alleged that the negligence of Eric Tanner in backing up a motor vehicle caused Natasha to be injured. The cause was tried to a jury. Tanner moved for a directed verdict at the close of Hargrove’s case and renewed the motion at the close of all the evidence. Pursuant to Civ.R. 50, the trial court directed a verdict for Tanner after finding that the evidence presented did not establish a breach of any duty of care which Tanner owed Natasha.
Hargrove appeals.
Assignment of Error
“The trial court committed…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Ruta v. Breckenridge-Remy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
- O'Day v. WebbOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- Baum v. AugensteinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
3Cited by53 opinions
- Cooper v. Grace Baptist Church of Columbus, Ohio, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Mastellone v. Lightning Rod Mutual InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Nageotte v. Cafaro Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Keeton v. Telemedia Co. of Southern OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Northeast Ohio Elite Gymnastics Training Center, Inc. v. OsborneOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.