State ex rel. State Board of Equalization v. Barta
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Hardesty, J.:
These consolidated appeals arise from the same central conflict over property tax valuation that we addressed in State, Board of Equalization v. Bakst.2 In Bakst, several taxpayers challenged the Washoe County Assessor’s use of certain appraisal methods to es*616tablish the taxable values of their properties for the 2003-2004 tax year. The district court, and later this court, determined that the Assessor’s methods were unconstitutional and ordered the taxpayers’ properties’ taxable values rolled back to the 2002-2003 tax year levels.3
Meanwhile, several Incline…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Public Employees' Benefits Program v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police DepartmentNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Nevada Power Co. v. HaggertyNevada Supreme Court · 1999
- Mainor v. NaultNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. Central Pacific RailroadNevada Supreme Court · 1875
- Spears v. SpearsNevada Supreme Court · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Chapman v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Great Basin Water Network v. State Eng'rNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- STATE EX REL. BD. OF EQUALIZATION v. BartaNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Marvin v. FitchNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- Berrum v. OttoNevada Supreme Court · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.