Legal Opinion
Schmitz v. Verdad Asset Management, LLC
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 11, 2025No. 8:24-cv-02291Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND NICHOLAS SCHMITZ, * Plaintiff, * v. * Civil Action No. 8: 24-2291-PX VERDAD ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC et al., * Defendants. * *** MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending are Defendants Verdad Asset Management, LLC, Verdad Advisers, LP, and Daniel Rasmussen’s motion to dismiss brought pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF No. 16. The matter has been fully briefed, and no hearing is necessary. See Loc. R. 105.6. For the following reasons, the motion to dismiss is granted. I. Background In 2016, two roommates, Plaintiff Nicholas…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Edwin P. Harrison, and United States of America, Party in Interest v. Westinghouse Savannah River CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Texas Utilities Electric Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- Southern Walk at Broadlands Homeowner's Ass'n v. OpenBand at Broadlands, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.