Legal Opinion
Babayev v. Medtronic, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 6, 2017No. 10-CV-2038 (SLT)(VMS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TOWNES, United States District Judge:
Plaintiff Mikhail Babayev (“Plaintiff’) brings this torts action against defendant Medtronic, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Medtronic”), seeking to recover damages for a hip fracture he allegedly sustained as a result of an electric shock he received following the implantation of a neurostimulator manufactured by Defendant. Defendant now moves for summary judgment, principally arguing that the Medical Device Amendments to the Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act preempts each of the five causes of action contained in Plaintiffs Amended Complaint.…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Desch v. Merz North America, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2023
- Gallego v. Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2025
- Gregory v. Boston Scientific CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025
- Nelson Gallego, as Administrator of the Estate of Jillian Rose Castro Figueroa v. Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2026
- Sheinfeld v. B. Braun Medical Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2024