State v. Brunson
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.
— Trial courts in three burglary cases instructed their juries that they may make the following inference: a person who enters or remains unlawfully in a building intends to commit a crime against people or property inside. Defendants argue the inference is unconstitutional. The court of appeals upheld the validity of the instruction, and we affirm.
Facts
Kevin Brunson
At 3:38 a.m. on March 24, 1991, a police officer found a three-foot hole in the front door of Agency Rent-a-Car in Burien. Inside, all the rooms were "in disorder," appearing as if "somebody had gone through everything.”
The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. BergeronWashington Supreme Court · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- State v. DrumWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. BencivengaWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. BencivengaWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. DealWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. ElmoreWashington Supreme Court · 2005
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.