Legal Opinion

State v. Brunson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1995No. Nos. 62141-1; 62645-6PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

— Trial courts in three burglary cases instructed their juries that they may make the following inference: a person who enters or remains unlawfully in a building intends to commit a crime against people or property inside. Defendants argue the inference is unconstitutional. The court of appeals upheld the validity of the instruction, and we affirm.

Facts

Kevin Brunson

At 3:38 a.m. on March 24, 1991, a police officer found a three-foot hole in the front door of Agency Rent-a-Car in Burien. Inside, all the rooms were "in disorder," appearing as if "somebody had gone through everything.”

The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. State v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. BergeronWashington Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. DrumWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. BencivengaWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. BencivengaWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. DealWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. ElmoreWashington Supreme Court · 2005

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API