Legal Opinion
State v. Stewart
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 3, 2003No. AC 22469PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The defendant, Kwame Stewart, appeals from the trial court’s judgment of conviction rendered after his guilty plea to the charge of sale of narcotics in violation of General Statutes § 21a-277 (a).1 On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the court improperly denied his motion to vacate his guilty plea and (2) his plea was erroneously made due to the inef*240fective assistance of his counsel. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural histoiy are relevant to the defendant’s appeal. The Bloomfield police department received information from an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. GilniteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Seattle Lake Shore & Eastern Railroad v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. ColonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. RosadoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. MutwaleSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- Gonzalez v. State Elections Enforcement CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013