Legal Opinion

Littau v. Midwest Commodities, Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1982No. 13284PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSHEIM, Justice.

Harlan Pease, Telford Tofflemire and Midwest Commodities, Inc. (Midwest) appeal from a Judgment entered in favor of Merlyn Littau. We reverse in part, affirm in part and remand.

Midwest held a meeting at Winner, South Dakota on November 9, 1978 to promote Sunoil 1000 hybrid sunflower seed. At this meeting Appellee discussed becoming a dealer of this seed with Appellant Toffle-mire, Chuck Lefforge (a defendant below) and Roy Leicht (apparently an agent of Midwest, but not a defendant). The following day, Appellee met again with these people and agreed to sell Sunoil 1000 seed.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HobelsbergerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Schmidt v. Wildcat Cave, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Aschoff v. Mobil Oil Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Moore v. Kluthe & Lane Ins. Agency, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Boos v. ClaudeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Garrett v. BankWest, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Moss v. GuttormsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Taggart v. Ford Motor Credit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Ducheneaux v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Tri-State Refining & Investment Co. v. Apaloosa Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API