Legal Opinion

Patrick Doyle v. Municipal Commission of the State of Minnesota

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 14, 1972No. 72-1320PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case, the appellants, residents of Burnside Township, seek to enjoin the consolidation of their township with the nearby City of Red Wing, Minnesota. They claim that the procedures under which a state agency 1 effected consolidation of these two units of local government denied the residents of the township, who were unwillingly absorbed into the city, their constitutional rights to equal protection and due process. Ruling that the plaintiffs’ complaint raised no substantial constitutional claim, the district court (Chief Judge Devitt) refused appellants’ request to convene a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Doyle v. Municipal Commission of State of MinnesotaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Texfi Industries, Inc. v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Berry v. BourneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
  3. Citizens Committee to Oppose Annexation v. City of LynchburgDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1975
  4. Texfi Industries, Inc. v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API