Legal Opinion

The Mastan Company, Incorporated, (Plaintiff) v. William Steinberg v. Steamship Sapphire Sandy, Her Engines, Tackle, Etc., (Defendant), Todd Shipyards Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 18, 1969No. 17879Published

1Opinion of the Court

418 F.2d 177

The MASTAN COMPANY, Incorporated, (Plaintiff),

v.

William STEINBERG et al., v. STEAMSHIP SAPPHIRE SANDY, her

engines, tackle, etc., (Defendant), Todd Shipyards

Corporation, Appellant.

(D.C. Civil Action No. 284-67) No. 17879.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Oct. 6, 1969.

Decided Nov. 18, 1969.

Edward Gross, Gross & Novak, Newark, N.J., Crowell, Rouse & Varian, New York City, for appellant.

George D. Byrnes, Zock, Petrie, Sheneman & Reid, New York City (John R. Sheneman, New York City, on the brief), for appellee.

Before McLAUGHLIN, FORMAN and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.

OPIN…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Diaz v. the S.S. SeathunderDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1961
  5. Atlantic Steamer Supply Company v. the SS TradewindDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API