Legal Opinion

Diaz v. the S.S. Seathunder

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 1, 1961No. 4002PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

R. DORSEY WATKINS, District Judge.

The question before the court is whether or not intervening libelants, Maryland Shipbuilding & Drydock Company, Atlantic Cordage & Supply Corporation, Dalzell Towing Company, Inc., et al. and Charles F. Hughes, are entitled to maritime liens against the S. S. Seathunder in view of language prohibiting the creation of liens contained in a bareboat charter dated April 6, 1956, between the corporate respondent, Preston Corporation of Monrovia, Liberia (Preston) as owner, and Ocean Trading Corporation (Ocean) as charterer. A copy of the charter has been filed in…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United States v. CarverSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Dampskibsselskabet Dannebrog v. Signal Oil & Gas Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Field v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  5. United States v. SheaSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City of Auburn v. MandarelliSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  2. In Re North Atlantic and Gulf Steamship CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  3. Farwest Steel Corp. v. Barge Sea-Span 241Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Ocean Cargo Lines, Ltd. v. North Atlantic Marine Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
  5. Interocean Shipping Co. v. M/V LYGARIADistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API