Legal Opinion

Schulenberg v. Zimmerman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 25, 1902No. Nos. 12,948-(127)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of tbe district court for Sibley county dismissing tbe action, entered pursuant to tbe findings and order of Cadwell, J.

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

Action to enjoin tbe defendants from obstructing a water course, and for damages.

Tbe complaint alleges that'tbe parties hereto are tbe owners of adjoining farms, and describes tbe land of each; also [that on tbe plaintiff’s land, near tbe eastern boundary thereof, is situated a tract of five acres of wet land, or marsh, from which there leads in a northeasterly direction a natural water course, through which tbe waters accumulating in plaintiff’s marsh have heretofore been discharged over tbe defendants’ land and other adjoining lands into tbe High Island creek; that more than twenty-five…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kray v. MuggliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  2. Mueller v. FruenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  3. Canton Iron Co. v. Biwabik Bessemer Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Naporra v. WeckwerthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Deruwe v. MorrisonWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Baldwin v. FisherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API