Legal Opinion

Department of Transportation v. Higdon

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 16, 1986No. 8628SC295PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendants contend that the trial court erred in its determination that the area taken by plaintiff was the area described in the plat. We disagree.

In Ledford v. Highway Comm., 279 N.C. 188, 190-91, 181 S.E. 2d 466, 468 (1971), our Supreme Court stated:

“Taking” under the power of eminent domain may be defined generally as entering upon private property for more than a momentary period and, under the warrant or color of legal authority, devoting it to a public use, or otherwise informally appropriating or injuriously affecting it in such a way as substantially to oust the owner…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Winston-Salem v. FerrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Thompson v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Ledford v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DeHart v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Department of Transportation v. Quick as a Wink of Asheville West, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API