Legal Opinion

Cook v. Burnett

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Cass. (O’Hara, J.) Keplevin. Plaintiff brings error. The facts necessary to a decision of the case are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Champús-, C. J.

This cause was tried before the court without a jury, and the circuit judge made written findings of fact and his conclusions of law thereon. No exceptions were taken to either the findings of fact or of law. The case is brought here by bill of exceptions and writ of error.

The errors assigned relate exclusively to the findings of law, and to the court's refusal to find certain conclusions of law requested by plaintiff. In McMillan v. Cheese Factory, 23 Mich. 544, there were written findings of fact and law, but no exception was taken to the findings of fact, nor to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McMillan v. Gilt Edge Cheese FactoryMichigan Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weist v. MorlockMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Wayne County Savings Bank v. School District No. 5Michigan Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API