Legal Opinion

People v. One Parcel of Land

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 23, 1991No. A051895PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

—In this case we hold that a trial court has inherent equitable authority to set aside a default judgment of forfeiture of real property at which drug trafficking had occurred, based on extrinsic fraud or mistake.

The property at issue is a four-plex apartment building in Richmond. The owner, Jerline L. Wallace, is an absentee landlord who lives in Fairfield. On September 22, 1989, the People filed a complaint for forfeiture of the building (Health & Saf. Code, § 11470 et seq.), on the ground cocaine and cocaine base had been possessed for sale and sold on the premises. Wallace,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Weitz v. YankoskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Aldrich v. San Fernando Valley Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Lopez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. United States v. $135,290 U.S. CurrencyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mechling v. Asbestos, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Filipescu v. California Housing Finance AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. People v. PrinceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Huff v. Interior Specialists, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2024
  5. Mechling v. AsbestosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API