Legal Opinion

AFL-CIO v. Deukmejian

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 20, 1989No. C002364PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PUGLIA, P. J.

This appeal arises out of Proposition 65, an initiative adopted at the November 1986 General Election. The initiative, designed to protect the people and their water supply from harmful chemicals, added sections 25249.5—25249.13 to the Health and Safety Code (hereafter all statutory references to sections of an unspecified code are to this code). Section 25249.8, subdivision (a) requires the Governor, on or before March 1, 1987, to publish a list of “chemicals known to the state to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity.” The list must include “at a minimum” those…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Carlos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. People v. TannerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Brosnahan v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Legislature v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Breslin v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Baxter Healthcare Corp. v. DentonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Rodriguez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. City of Morgan Hill v. Bay Area Air Quality Management DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. California Chamber of Commerce v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API