Legal Opinion
People v. Hueston
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 2, 1974PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRabin, J.
The question presented in this appeal is whether evidence obtained as a result of telephone conversations intercepted pursuant to a warrant should be suppressed. The Appellate Division, apparently holding that the eavesdropping warrant was void on its face, ordered that all evidence obtained as a result of the conversations be suppressed. We reverse.
The defendant Bonnie Kerr (Kerr) was convicted of criminal possession of a dangerous drug in the third degree and in the fourth degree. The defendant Anthony Hueston (Hueston) was convicted of the same crimes, and also of unlawfully using slugs in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gelbard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Joseph E. Cafero A/K/A Ernie, in No. 72-1577 Appeal of Dominick Vinciguerra, A/K/A Dom, in No. 72-1578Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- United States v. LaGorgaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- United States v. Gordon Vincent Eastman and Anthony Hueston A/K/A Tony Heston, A/K/A Tony Dejest. Nos. 71-1643, 71-1644Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- People v. TarttNew York Supreme Court · 1972
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Ralph PrincipieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- People v. ScoccoNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. GallinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Spease and Ross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- People v. SimmonsNew York Supreme Court · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.