Legal Opinion
Seeton v. Pennsylvania Game Commission
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 27, 2007No. 6 MAP 2005PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice BAER.1
Appellant Johnna Seeton filed in the Commonwealth Court a Complaint in Mandamus alleging that the Pennsylvania Game Commission (Commission) improperly concluded that it lacked authority to interfere with what she alleged were the Tioga Boar Hunt Preserve’s (Tioga) ongoing violations of the Pennsylvania Game and Wildlife Code, 34 Pa.C.S. §§ 101, et seq. (Game and Wildlife Code). She asked the Commonwealth Court to reject the Commission’s claim that it lacks *567jurisdiction over Tioga and hold that the Commission’s own regulations as well as its statutory mandate require…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- United States v. CartwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Costopoulos v. ThornburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Malt Beverages Distributors Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Fumo v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Banfield, Aplts. v. Secretary of the ComSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- M.J. Brouillette v. T. Wolf, GovernorCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Kistler v. Commonwealth, State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.