Legal Opinion

Tighe v. Town of Berlin

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 22, 2002No. SC 16439PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NORCOTT, J.

The sole issue in this appeal1 is whether the trial court improperly denied the request for an injunction by the named plaintiff, James Tighe, and the plaintiff, Joyce Tighe, to require the removal of a traffic gate erected to control access to and from an abandoned roadway. The plaintiffs appeal from the judgment of the trial court denying their request for an injunction against the named defendant, the town of Berlin.2 The *85plaintiffs argue that the trial court improperly interpreted the scope of General Statutes § 13a-55.3 The plaintiffs further argue that the trial court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Moore v. SerafinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Town of OrangeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  4. Karls v. Alexandra Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. Advest, Inc. v. WachtelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. City of Waterbury v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  2. State v. AlstonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  3. Broadnax v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. State v. VickersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  5. Brennan v. Brennan AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API