Legal Opinion

Zainudin v. Meizel

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 21, 1953No. Civ. 15312PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Plaintiffs sued for damages for fraudulent representations leading to their purchase from certain named defendants of a leasehold in a hotel. At the trial plaintiffs dismissed as to three of the named defendants and a nonsuit was granted as to one other. On a trial to a jury a verdict was returned against the four remaining defendants for $24,000 compensatory damages and $5,000 punitive damages. Two of these defendants, Meizel and Cook appealed. Pending the appeal the defendant Meizel deceased and his administratrix was duly substituted and the same counsel appears for her.

A brief outline of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Sutphin v. SpeikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Case v. Kadota Fig Ass'n of ProducersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Case v. Kadota Fig Assn.California Supreme Court · 1950
  5. English v. EnglishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Clark v. LesherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Watenpaugh v. State Teacher's Retirement SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Lawson v. Town & Country Shops, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Spencer v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Watenpaugh v. State Teachers' RetirementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API