Leo v. Casselman
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.
This action was instituted for the purpose of recovering a commission for the sale of real estate and some personal property. The cause, tried to the court, resulted in a judgment favorable to the defendants.
In presenting his appeal, appellant assigns error on the part of the trial court in holding that the agreement was within the statute of frauds, in dismissing plaintiff’s complaint, in refusing to grant plaintiff judgment on the agreement, and in refusing to grant judgment for a commission on at least two thousand dollars worth of personal property.
The evidence produced at the trial may…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Grammer v. Skagit Valley Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
- Martinson v. CruikshankWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Barth v. BarthWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. O'MarrMontana Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by12 opinions
- Geoghegan v. DeverWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Edwards v. MeaderWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Schweiter v. HalseyWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- F. D. Hill & Co. v. WallerichWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- McKoin v. KunesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.