Legal Opinion

Leandro v. State

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1996No. COA 95-321PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

Although denial of a motion to dismiss under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 12(b)(2) is immediately appealable, Teachy v. Coble Dairies, Inc., 306 N.C. 324, 327, 293 S.E.2d 182, 184 (1982), denial of a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1) or 12(b)(6) is ordinarily interlocutory and not immediately appealable. Id. at 326-27, 293 S.E.2d at 183-84. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure, however, petition for writ of certiorari was allowed in order to review the trial court’s order denying the motions to dismiss under G.S. § 1A-1, Rules…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hazelwood School District v. KuhlmeierSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Teachy v. Coble Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Texfi Industries, Inc. v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. In Re: Joseph Lee MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Leandro v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  2. Coalition for Adequacy v. ChilesSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  3. Hoke County Board of Education v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  4. Perry v. Carolina Builders Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  5. DeRolph v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API