Legal Opinion
Central R.R. Co. of N.J. v. Simandl
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided September 8, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This matter is before me on the return of an order to show cause why preliminary injunction should not issue on a bill of complaint brought by The Central Railroad Company of New Jersey and the Board of Public Utility Commissioners of the State of New Jersey against Emanuel Simandl, Benton and Holden, Incorporated, and Anna Miskiw.
The Central Railroad Company of New Jersey was ordered by the Board of Public Utility Commissioners, on July 23d 1935, to eliminate certain grade crossings from its Elizabeth-port and Perth Amboy branch, in the city of Elizabeth, among which is the crossing at…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Gilbough v. West Side Amusement Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1902
- McMillan v. KuehnleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
- Green v. PiperNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1912
- Benton Holden v. Central R.R. Co. of N.J.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clayton v. New Dreamland Roller Skating RinkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Claus v. BrodheadNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955