Legal Opinion
Benton Holden v. Central R.R. Co. of N.J.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided September 14, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Complainant in its bill of complaint prays the court to enjoin the Central Railroad Company of New Jersey and P.T. Cox Contracting Company, Incorporated, from performing any work which will disturb the surface of Elizabeth avenue in the city of Elizabeth, as said avenue now exists between Third and Fourth streets, and from in any manner preventing and interfering with complainant's business and the use of complainant's property.
The matter is before me on motion for a preliminary injunction.
Complainant is the owner of a building especially adapted to the business of storage warehousing located…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Grey ex rel. Simmons v. Mayor of PatersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
- Eggers v. AndersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
- McGann v. La Brecque Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1920
- L. Martin Co. v. L. Martin & Wilckes Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- A-117-11 Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Intermodal Properties, LLC (070240)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- Van Name v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
- City of Camden v. South Jersey Port Com'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Central R.R. Co. of N.J. v. SimandlNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938